This gentleman is a prolific poster on many of the MA boards, and I’ve usually seen him commenting on EPAK topics. I found his analysis of combination 3 interesting, as I find myself frequently troubleshooting combinations. I don’t necessarily agree with his version of 3 as being a good representation of a typical SKK implementation, but I do like his thought process on it. One danger of this process is that by the time you have ‘troubleshot’ the problems out, you’ve just ended up at an entirely new technique. If you replace all of the planks in the boat, it’s not the same boat any more.
Technical Stuff
Recent Comments
- john mason on In memory of GM Fred Villari
- J on In memory of GM Fred Villari
- Joseph Catanese on A Glimpse at Kajukenbo
Top Commentators
- marlon (113)
- Todd (61)
- Jesse (56)