<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I think point sparring is harmful.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s get back to Kempo...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:53:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Although the author backs away from the relationship between sparring and testing self defense skill in comments 13 and 20, the title of the article is clear that it is a test of skill, and he takes pains to clarify the difference between testing skill and testing ability. 

So, sparring tests skills inherent in self-defense, but doesn&#039;t necessarily test self-defense ability, at least as far as I can tell from the article as is stated here: 

from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.24fightingchickens.com/2008/03/09/facing-a-harsh-reality-sparring-measures-skill-you-just-arent-as-good-as-you-thought/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;24fightingchickens.com&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Sparring does not test real fighting ability. There is a difference, however, between fighting ability (i.e. the techniques a person could execute) and fighting skills (i.e. the underlying skills that make the execution of techniques more effective). Sparring does compare many skills that are necessary in real fighting: speed, agility, maneuvering, focus with ability to hit targets, ability to read and predict movements, maintaining a strong physical presence, setting people up, timing, footwork, reaction, offensive ability, defensive ability, blocking, countering, etc&lt;/blockquote&gt;



I still fall on a net negative balance as far as benefit. The drawbacks outweigh the benefits of point sparring. There is the example of the author &#039;demolishing the newbies&#039; at his MMA practice, but I can&#039;t see why that comes solely as a benefit of sparring as opposed to his other TMA training.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the author backs away from the relationship between sparring and testing self defense skill in comments 13 and 20, the title of the article is clear that it is a test of skill, and he takes pains to clarify the difference between testing skill and testing ability. </p>
<p>So, sparring tests skills inherent in self-defense, but doesn&#8217;t necessarily test self-defense ability, at least as far as I can tell from the article as is stated here: </p>
<p>from <a href="http://www.24fightingchickens.com/2008/03/09/facing-a-harsh-reality-sparring-measures-skill-you-just-arent-as-good-as-you-thought/" rel="nofollow">24fightingchickens.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Sparring does not test real fighting ability. There is a difference, however, between fighting ability (i.e. the techniques a person could execute) and fighting skills (i.e. the underlying skills that make the execution of techniques more effective). Sparring does compare many skills that are necessary in real fighting: speed, agility, maneuvering, focus with ability to hit targets, ability to read and predict movements, maintaining a strong physical presence, setting people up, timing, footwork, reaction, offensive ability, defensive ability, blocking, countering, etc</p></blockquote>
<p>I still fall on a net negative balance as far as benefit. The drawbacks outweigh the benefits of point sparring. There is the example of the author &#8216;demolishing the newbies&#8217; at his MMA practice, but I can&#8217;t see why that comes solely as a benefit of sparring as opposed to his other TMA training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KMB</title>
		<link>http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>KMB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kempoinfo.com/2008/03/20/why-i-think-point-sparring-is-harmful/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the point of the 24FC article was that sparring is a &quot;reasonable test of skill.&quot;  My understanding was actually the opposite - as one of the comments summarized, the point was that while it is silly to say that point sparring is an accurate reflection of fighting ability, it is equally silly to say that sparring is devoid of any useful skills to compare.  Comment 20 on the article is an excellent summary of the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the point of the 24FC article was that sparring is a &#8220;reasonable test of skill.&#8221;  My understanding was actually the opposite &#8211; as one of the comments summarized, the point was that while it is silly to say that point sparring is an accurate reflection of fighting ability, it is equally silly to say that sparring is devoid of any useful skills to compare.  Comment 20 on the article is an excellent summary of the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

